Ukrainian-czechoslovak agrarianist discourse in 1920s - 1930s

Purpose. The purpose is to investigate the Ukrainian-Czechoslovak agrarianist discourse of 1920s and 1930s.Conclusion. authors found out that in 1930s, active cooperation developed between Czechoslovak Ukrainian agrarianists, most prominent centre which wasthe Agrarian Society Academy Economics Podebrady. In thewritings concept «the newest agrarianism»,together with criticism liberalism, capitalism, socialism, communism fascism, acquired alogical systematic presentation. ideological mutual influence regarding defence theeconomic moral advantages agriculture, small private ownership land, cooperation, aswell as state regulation economy noticeable. agrarianistdiscourse clearly emphasizes moderate reforms, are understood tools for formationof a large class grain-grower owners. views theorist agrarianism theinterwar period H. Simantsiv related opinions theorists practitioners – A. Svehla, M. Hodza, J. Kettner others, whose works author agrarianism» became acquainted during his activities Society(UAS) Podyebrady. addition, Symantsiv model based on understanding not only European, particular Czechoslovakian, theoretical thought, but also Ukrainian. durability theUkrainian intellectual tradition, such Hrushevsky V. Lypynsky,is palpable, its distinct presence Symantsiv’s agrarianism. Simantsivmanaged logically consistently reveal essence content agrarianism.He substantiates principles positions modern concerning individualityof peasantry, mentality, role peasantry an subject state- nationbuilding, etc. Thus, heritage self-sufficient ofthe agrarianism, consistent discourse.